CPT 27134 – Revision Hip Arthroplasty: What You Need to Know

CPT 27134 – Revision Hip Arthroplasty: What You Need to Know

CPT 27134 – Revision Hip Arthroplasty: What You Need to Know

CPT 27134 – Revision Hip Arthroplasty: What You Need to Know

Get Started

Tell us a little bit more about your practice and we will be in touch shortly
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Overview of the Code

  • CPT 27134, Revision of total hip arthroplasty; both acetabular and femoral components, with or without autograft/allograft, covers comprehensive revision of both hip prosthesis components. It’s more complex than unilateral revisions and encompasses higher RVUs, increased operative time, and greater clinical challenge. It carries a 90‑day global period.
    No specific RVU numbers or surgery duration were cited here, but clinical intensity is well established.

  • Medical Necessity Guidelines specific to Medicare coverage (CMS LCD A56796) confirm that CPT 27134 is covered when documentation aligns with reasonable and necessary criteria detailed in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) for lower extremity major joint replacement. Ensure ICD‑10 codes support necessity.

Modifiers That Can Improve Reimbursement (and When to Use Them)

Modifier 22 – Increased Procedural Services

Used when CPT 27134 involves unusually extensive effort beyond typical revision complexity.

Appropriate Use Cases:

  • Massive bone loss needing structural allograft beyond routine grafting

  • Extraction of broken or well-fixed components with substantial difficulty

  • Extensive scar tissue from multiple prior revisions

  • Simultaneous intraoperative fracture repair beyond routine steps

Documentation Tips:

  • Clearly state in the operative note: “Increased procedural complexity due to…”

  • Detail extra time (e.g., “+90 min additional OR time”), technical modifications, and clinical challenges

  • Attach supporting documentation (e.g. implant logs, photos)

  • Expect closer payer scrutiny and possible reimbursement delay

Other Modifiers to Avoid Denials During the Global Period

Even though the 90‑day global period covers routine follow-ups, services outside this scope may need:

  • Modifier 24 — Unrelated E/M during global (e.g., medical issue unrelated to hip surgery)

  • Modifier 78 — Unplanned return to OR for complications

  • Modifier 58 — Planned staged or anticipated procedure

  • Modifier 59 — Distinct procedural service performed separately (use cautiously)

Top Denial Reasons & How to Avoid Them

Denial Scenario

Reason

Remedy

Denied Modifier 22

Inadequate documentation of complexity

Amplify operative note and evidence

Global Period Follow-Up Denied

E/M billed as routine post-op care

Use Modifier 24 for unrelated visits

Return to OR Denied as Post-Op

Treated as part of global episode

Use Modifier 78 to flag unplanned re‑op

Staged Procedure Misinterpreted

Seen as complication

Use Modifier 58 for planned staging

Unbundled Procedure Denied

Claimed separate but part of revision

Use Modifier 59 only if truly distinct

Sample Scenarios with UB‑04 Billing Examples

(Visualization via UB‑04 sample fields is recommended for clarity)

Scenario 1 – Complex Revision + Modifier 22

  • Clinical Scenario: Massive bone loss requiring structural allograft and difficult removal of a broken femoral stem

  • UB‑04 Field 44 (HCPCS): 27134‑22

  • Diagnosis (ICD‑10): Supported diagnosis like periprosthetic fracture or mechanical complication — aligns with CMS guidelines

  • Item 19 (Remarks): “Increased complexity: broken stem removal + structural allograft, +90 min; details in attached op note.”

  • Attachments: Operative report, implant logs, photos

Scenario 2 – Return to OR for Postoperative Dislocation

  • Situation: On day 20 post-surgery, patient returns to OR for a dislocation reduction

  • Field 44: 27134‑78

  • Note: Use modifier 78 to indicate an unplanned return for complication care.

Scenario 3 – Planned Staged Bilateral Revision

  • Situation: Right hip revised now; left hip planned later as staged procedure

  • Field 44: 27134‑58

  • Note: Shows this is anticipated and not a complication-driven return.

Medicare Medical Necessity Guidance

The CMS Local Coverage Article A56796 (Lower Extremity Major Joint Replacement) reinforces:

  • Medical necessity must be justified with proper ICD‑10 codes and documentation.

  • Documentation must match ICD‑10 codes that are listed as supporting necessity for CPT 27134.

Summary of Best Practices

  • Use CPT 27134 only when both hip components are revised in one procedure.

  • Apply Modifier 22 for significantly more complex cases, with robust documentation.

  • Use global-period modifiers (24, 58, 78, 59) accurately to prevent denials.

  • Link to correct ICD‑10 codes per CMS guidelines to justify medical necessity.

  • Attach detailed operative notes and supporting evidence, especially when using modifier 22.

Let’s grow together.

How do you bill medicaid? Improve retention without hiring?
Get ahead of 2025 CMS changes?

Schedule a demo with Athelas today to find out.