Avoiding CPT 29806 Denials: Common Mistakes in Orthopedics

Avoiding CPT 29806 Denials: Common Mistakes in Orthopedics

Avoiding CPT 29806 Denials: Common Mistakes in Orthopedics

Avoiding CPT 29806 Denials: Common Mistakes in Orthopedics

Get Started

Tell us a little bit more about your practice and we will be in touch shortly
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

You just finished a clean arthroscopic rotator cuff repair—CPT 29806. The op note is detailed, the patient’s happy, and you’re ready for reimbursement. Then the denial hits: “Missing documentation of tear size” or “Modifier -RT not recognized.” One claim, **$…

In 2025, CPT 29806 (arthroscopic shoulder capsulorrhaphy with rotator cuff repair) is one of the most audited ortho codes. Payers like UHC, Aetna, and CMS are laser-focused on medical necessity, tear specifics, and modifier accuracy.

Here are the 5 biggest denial traps mid-market ortho groups fall into—and how to fix them fast.

Top 5 Reasons 29806 Claims Get Denied

Denial Reason % of 29806 Denials* Quick Fix
Missing tear size/type 34% Document “full-thickness,” “crescent,” “2.5 cm” in op note
No pre-auth or auth mismatch 26% Submit pre-auth with MRI + clinical findings
Wrong or missing laterality modifier 18% Always append -LT or -RT
Bundling with 29827 12% Use -59 if separate compartment
Op note lacks implant details 10% List anchor brand, number, and placement

Aggregated from Athelas ortho customer ERA data, Q1–Q2 2025

How to Bulletproof Your 29806 Documentation

1. Pre-Op: Lock the Necessity

Include in your H&P:

“MRI: 3.1 cm full-thickness supraspinatus tear with retraction. Failed 6 wks PT. Persistent night pain, weakness on Jobe test.”

2. Op Note: Be Specific, Not Poetic

Use this 3-sentence formula:

  1. Tear description: “Full-thickness supraspinatus tear, 2.8 cm AP, 1.2 cm medial-lateral, crescent shape.”
  2. Repair technique: “Mobilized to bone bed. Double-row repair using 4 medial + 2 lateral bioabsorbable anchors (Arthrex Corkscrew).”
  3. Laterality + closure: “Right shoulder. Capsule closed with #2 FiberWire.”

3. Modifiers: Don’t Guess

  • -RT / -LT: Always
  • -59: Only if 29806 + 29827 in separate compartments (e.g., subacromial vs. glenohumeral)
  • -51: Rarely needed (payer-specific)

4. Pre-Auth: Submit the Right Combo

Include:

  • MRI report (tear size, retraction)
  • Failed conservative care (PT notes, injections)
  • Functional deficit (DASH score, ROM)

29806 Op Note Snippet

Procedure: Right shoulder arthroscopy with rotator cuff repair (29806-RT)

Findings: Full-thickness supraspinatus tear, 3.0 cm x 1.5 cm, crescent pattern, 0.8 cm retraction.

Repair: Tendon mobilized to anatomic footprint. Double-row repair: 3 medial anchors (SwiveLock 4.75mm), 2 lateral anchors (PushLock 3.5mm). Secure fixation confirmed.

Red Flags That Scream “Audit Me”

Risky Phrase Better Version
“Rotator cuff repair” “Full-thickness supraspinatus repair, 2.7 cm, double-row”
“Anchors used” “4 medial + 2 lateral bioabsorbable anchors”
“Left shoulder” “Left shoulder (-LT)”

Pro Tips to Stay Ahead

  • Train your AI scribe: Teach it to auto-populate tear size from your dictation.
  • Run a weekly 29806 audit: Pull last 10 claims. Check modifiers + tear details.
  • Use a pre-auth checklist: One-page PDF in every surgeon’s template.

The Bottom Line

29806 denials aren’t random—they’re predictable. Nail tear specifics, laterality, and pre-auth, and you’ll cut rejections by 70%+.

Let’s grow together.

How do you bill medicaid? Improve retention without hiring?
Get ahead of 2025 CMS changes?

Schedule a demo with Athelas today to find out.